Test, problems, and solutions for the SMA to IPEX cable for ADALM-PLUTO second channel


Another important piece written by Gianni IW1EPY about the long-standing problem of the IPEX-SMA cables used for the second channel of the ADALM-PLUTO. Here is his tutorial:


A set of different SMA female to IPEX was purchased from China:

Type 1. This is 5 cm long using RG178
Test result for the Type 1 cable
Type 2 using RG 1.13
Test result for the Type 2 cable. Sorry, it’s not smooth due to the fast sweep, but the reality remains.
Question: Is the IPEX connector the problem?
Using two SMAs coming from type 1 and using the correct cable RG316 for that connector, with the center cable in the hole and the braid soldered.
A good result is obtained.
Using an adapter for RG 1.13 with a good SMA connector
Test of 30 cm RG 1.13
Again a good result
What about the IPEX?

Same cable length, same SMA with adapter for RG 1.13 and an IPEX IPEX junction.
See also the channel 2 Pluto test of one of those cables.

This means that with a good SMA connection and a couple of IPEX, it can work up to 16 GHz.
First, no blame to the cable producer for usage up to 6 GHz is assured, but for us, that we take out the last still of lemon juice is not enough.
We use the second Rx as a reference for the VNA up to 12 GHz, so we would like a flat response in this range.
What is wrong?

These types of SMA cannot function properly; the correct Type 2 has many discontinuities and impedance changes that limit its use to around 6 GHz. On the left, Type 1 is its incorrect usage, as shown by my test with the proper coax cable. Inserting the entire coax cable, including the braid, into the SMA hole and soldering it is not correct. What happens? The tin solder connects the braid only at the rear entrance of the SMA, leaving a ground tube unconnected, which can be seen in the picture.

This insulated ground tube is responsible for the notch in the range from 6 to 8 GHz
Solution

Find the SMA with the correct cable hole to enter with the insulated central coax cable and solder the braid to the outside of the SMA.

For RG 1.13, use a small-hole SMA but avoid using too much solder; connect all the braid tube to the inner tube of the SMA.

Not the best, but usable

By now, the only solution to the problem is to purchase the IPEX cable and do the SMA connection.
Two good SMA-IPEX will allow the correct use of the second channel of ADALM-PLUTO up to 12 GHz.
Even without test systems is possible to use ADALM-PLUTO to make a comparison between cables to get the right one.

This is a bad cable with a large loss at 13,5 GHz
Again, bad, in this case at 11 GHz
This is the long RG 1.13 coming from the couple already tested (a twin cable used to validate the IPEX connector)
This is an RG 316 precrimped with IPEX in China and a China SMA for this type of cable.

Due to the stiffness of the cable is a bit longer to accommodate a larger bend of the cable vs the RG 178, which allows a shorter path but a worse performance.

73 51 de IW1EPY

One thought on “Test, problems, and solutions for the SMA to IPEX cable for ADALM-PLUTO second channel”

  1. so the length of the cable is not the main problem .. also maybe not the loss (thinner cable is not as good as a thicker one but still usable) … main thing is connection of the braid (ON BOTH SIDES!!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *